Tad's IT Blog
Posts tagged youtube
YouTube is Down for Maintenance?
Oct 3rd
Youtube is down for maintenance? Seems pretty unlikely that the world’s largest video platform, encompassing 20% of the world’s total Internet traffic, would just “go down for maintenance” in the middle of a Saturday.
Is this the next in Google’s IT uptime issues?
Flickr vs. YouTube: Mobile Video Quality
Jul 29th
I just posted on the quality & feature differences between Flickr video and YouTube, saying also that their mobile feature sets were quite similar, though video quality was about the same.
How wrong I just was, with respect to mobile video quality.
Have a look at these two samples, taken on an iPhone 3G, of the same video mentioned in my last post:
Flickr Video: [original video]
YouTube Video: [original video]
For some reason, the H.264 video that YouTube is encoding for the iPhone is of just the absolute worst quality – throughout the video, one can barely even tell what’s happening. Whereas, in contrast, the Flickr video is totally sharp and looks fantastic.
Odd – that was a comparison I didn’t expect. I’d be interested to see if that’s an iPhone-only difference, or if that’s the case on Windows Mobile and Android devices as well.
Flickr & YouTube – Video Quality & Features Comparison
Jul 29th
Flickr has a little known, and not oft-used ability for users to upload videos, as well as photos. As Flickr is primarily a photo site for photo enthusiasts, the purpose of Flickr videos was not to host the latest Shakira music video or Baby Bloopers w/Gangsta Rap soundtrack – but rather to augment one’s photographic exploits with moving pictures as well. Thus the reasoning behind Yahoo! putting a 90-second limit on Flickr video.
But, as photo display quality is such a hallmark of Flickr photos, I decided to do a little comparison on video quality, and compare it to the 900lb Gorilla, YouTube.
Following is a video I took of the first mountain bike ride on my new mountain bike, taken yesterday. It’s got a lot of full-screen motion, a worst-case scenario for the Flash Video encoders both at Flickr and YouTube. Here’s how they look:
FLICKR:
YOUTUBE:
Interestingly enough, it appears to me that the YouTube video is a bit crisper and has better motion details than the Flickr video. YouTube used to have positively the worst video quality, but it looks like they’ve definitely made some improvements of late.
But then, in terms of a features comparison, let’s take a look at the way these two services display video, to get an idea of which would be the better context to display such video clips in:
Video Tools:
YouTube is obviously the hands-down winner here. They offer annotations, audio change-outs (so you can swap out my grunting and “whoa nelly” with Crystal Method or whatever), the ability to change out the displayed thumbnail, closed-captioning, etc. Flickr offers no such tools – just the ability to upload, and then edit the caption, title & tags just like any Flickr Photo.
Display Context:
Probably the best reason why one would want to display your videos on Flickr is the display context of your video. If you’re in the middle of a camping trip, and you take 10 photos and 2 videos with your digital camera, it makes the most sense to be able to display all of those items in the same place. Displaying just the photos on Flickr or Photobucket or Facebook, and then putting the videos on YouTube doesn’t allow you to simply send someone to one page, and have them be able to see your trip.
To wit, see this set of my recent cross-country trip, which has a number of videos interspersed with the photo content – but the photo content all kept in order and in context.
Also, Flickr gives you the ability to display all your photos on a map, which gives yet another option for display context.
Mobile Capabilities:
Now this is an area where I would have expected YouTube to be in the lead completely, but Yahoo! has been putting quite a bit of work lately into their mobile sites. If you browse to this video on Flickr using an iPhone browser, you’ll see the page reformatted for the iPhone, complete with working video links. Clicking on the video then pulls up an H.264 version of the video that is playable on the iPhone. Slick!
Lesson on how you KNOW if you’re Actually at 10,600 feet
May 26th
When driving on the I-70 toward Colorado, if your Subaru is buff enough, you will finally come upon Vail Pass, at a breathtaking 10,603 feet.
Now, anyone who’s been mountain climbing in the Cascades knows that at about 10,000 feet, you see snow and ice and Glaciers and you lose your breath and have to start wearing gear and all sorts of things.
So of course, I see that sign, and had to verify, for myself, if they really meant it, and if this pass was indeed at 10,600 feet above sea level.
Parade of Videos of our Trip through Utah/Colorado
May 26th
While my wife & I are on our way across the country, I finally was able to stop at a place that’s got wifi, so I’m finally able to upload and work with some of the photos & video that I’ve been taking over the last 48 hrs. (Sorry, yet another opportunity for me to dig on one of the iphone’s only faults — no video).
We’ve been driving through Utah, Colorado and Kansas over the last 2 days, and have gotten to travel on what I feel are the most breathtakingly beautiful stretches of U.S. Interstate highway that there is.
Here’s a little sampling:
This was a rest stop in Utah on the I-70, not even marked as a “scenic turnout” or “vista” or anything. Just a bathroom stop.
And this is Glenwood Canyon in Colorado, part of what is the newest stretch of I-70, completed in 1996. Unfortunately, I left my wide-angle lens in the car!
And then here’s driving through the Eisenhower Tunnel on the I-70, at around 9,500 feet in altitude:
Recent Comments