Tad's IT Blog
Sweden’s Pirate Party: What is the Point?
I wasn’t about to write a blog post tonight, so I’m going to keep this short. But in my little Flock homepage, I saw this little headline story about the Pirate Party getting a seat in European parliament.
I really, honestly, am pretty disgusted by this.
First off, while I usually have some sympathy for embattled little technology people who get embroiled in legal battles, as they’re generally good people. However, after reading this page on their site, I lost any sympathy I ever had for them. My opinion is these Pirate Bay principals have zero cognitive idea of the concept of exchange — meaning someone skilled creates something, and provides it in exchange for something valuable back. For example, if many, many talented programmers work for a long time on a video game, and they finally finish it, and it’s great, then they then sell it and if you like it you buy it from them. That way they get money, and can afford to keep making neat video games.
They just seem to be interested in being “pirates” in the truest sense of the word — where you take things that rightfully belong to others, with no exchange, and without their permission.
Now, we have a political party that has, as it’s goal, abolishing the copyright system, abolishing the trademark system, and convincing people that, and I quote from Rick Falkvinge, the leader and founder of the party, “…that the government is not always good.”
OK, I’m not a politician or a copyright lawyer, but I am someone who has benefitted from the inventions and industriousness of others who invent and thereby commercialize things they have created, based on their own ingenuity and resourcefullness.
Would someone please enlighten me as to what possible good would come about through abolishing copyrights and patents? The only thing I can see is negative effects, quashing people who normally would try to come up with great stuff and sell it — driving them into apathy.
As a Scientologist, I definitely understand the role of trademarks and copyright law, as without such someone could publish books on my religion where people did voodoo dances, and then say it’s “Scientology”. So, the continued existance of my religion depends on such laws being in place. All other religions and organizations also depend on the same — it’s a basic agreement that helps hold the world together.
So, I reiterate: what possible good could a political party aiming to obliterate copyright law ever come to?
| Print article | This entry was posted by iphoneTad on June 8, 2009 at 11:31 pm, and is filed under blogging. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |







about 1 year ago
I want to find good pop music. Help me please.
about 1 year ago
Hm…that wasn’t totally the insight I was after. If you’re after good pop music, try itunes.com, last.fm or imeem.com. That should give you approximately three trillion songs to choose from, paid and unpaid, and a portion of them are likely to be pop music.
But for others viewing this — is music the central issue here? Reform of the patent and trademark laws extend way further that artistic IP rights.
about 1 year ago
Uhm. For reading up on the pirate party, you go to a comedic page on the pirate bay? These websites are not affiliated.
about 1 year ago
Definitely understood that these two organizations are not affiliated. I was merely drawing a link between the two — as the C|Net article I read stated that the Pirate Party was sympathetic to the Pirate Bay’s cause. That’s all. I also did subsequently read up on the Pirate Party’s site. But thanks for pointing that out.
about 1 year ago
its not so much that the abolition of copyright is a good thing and your ideas above are logical. If someone is talented and creates something interesting they should be rewarded for it. The problems lie in the market and its abuse of creative properties. inferior product has saturated the markets expecting ridiculously overinflated prices for low quality material. it makes the consumer feel cheated and more sympathetic towards the notion of piracy. Copyright law should not be abolished but something must be done to change things as it will fail if things continue as they are.